Gradient background

Back to webinars

Upcoming
aug 27
11:00 AM PT

Why accounting teams are moving beyond checklists

Why accounting teams are moving beyond checklists

Dark Blue Background Illustration

Reserve your spot

Beyond the Checklist

Checklist tools coordinated the close. The preparation stayed manual. Hear from two accounting leaders at Scale AI and Miro who moved past that barrier, and what changed for their close, their teams, and their audits.

The checklist managed the close. It never automated it.

For two decades, close software has coordinated the work: task lists, sign-offs, status. That mattered. Teams that adopted it ran tighter, more organized closes because of it.

But the preparation itself never moved. Journal entries, reconciliations, transaction matching, and flux analysis still get built by hand, often in spreadsheets, then logged in the checklist when they’re done.

That is now changing. Agents can pull source transactions, prepare entries, reconcile accounts as data arrives, and draft detailed variance explanations. They can then route the completed work to an accountant for review, with the supporting evidence attached.

The hours previously spent on tie-outs and manual processes that checklists could only observe can instead go toward reviewing exceptions, investigating issues, and doing the analysis the team never had time for.

This session is a practical conversation with two accounting leaders who have made that shift in high-volume, high-complexity, audit-heavy environments. They’ll share what changed for their close, their teams, and their audits, including faster close cycles, greater accuracy, and significant time and cost savings.

What you will learn

Where checklist tools stop, and why coordinating the close is different from preparing it

Why checklist tools struggle in high-transaction-volume, multi-entity environments, leaving teams with manual workarounds and Excel tie-outs

What agentic close automation looks like in practice, beyond bolt-on AI features layered on top of task coordination

How Scale AI and Miro evaluated AI-native close automation platforms, and which criteria mattered most

What happens to the accountant’s role when preparers become reviewers, and how teams create capacity without adding headcount

What auditors actually ask when agents prepare the work, and how evidence, lineage, and re-performance work in practice

How to pressure-test any automation vendor’s claims, including ours, and the questions these two leaders asked before making the move

Who should attend

Controllers, CAOs, VPs of accounting, and finance systems leaders at companies where the close still runs on spreadsheets plus a checklist.


About the Speakers

Josh Waldron

Josh leads accounting at Scale AI through rapid, pre-IPO-scale growth under a KPMG audit. His team automated 98% of cash workflows across 10+ upstream data sources by moving close preparation off checklist tooling and onto agent-prepared automation. Today, the team closes three days faster.

Madison Farnsworth

Madison owns the architecture behind Miro’s accounting and finance stack, helping design how the ERP, source systems, and automation work together to automate the close. She leads Miro’s adoption of agent-prepared workflows across bonus accruals, cash journals, and T&E coding.

Yogi Goel

Yogi is the CEO and Co-founder of Maxima. Previously, he led finance at Rubrik and spent two decades building and scaling accounting organizations across EY, Citigroup, and Barclays. Today, he works with some of the world’s leading finance teams to adopt agentic AI across the financial close.

Speakers

Chief Accounting Officer & Interim CFO, Scale AI

Josh Waldron

Josh Waldron

Head of Finance Systems, Miro

Madison Farnsworth

Madison Farnsworth

CEO & Co-founder, Maxima

Yogi Goel

Yogi Goel
Webinar registration illustration with the selected webinar title and description.

Reserve your spot

Webinar registration illustration with the selected webinar title and description.

Reserve your spot

Gradient background

Back to webinars

Upcoming
aug 27
11:00 AM PT

Why accounting teams are moving beyond checklists

Dark Blue Background Illustration

Reserve your spot

Beyond the Checklist

Checklist tools coordinated the close. The preparation stayed manual. Hear from two accounting leaders at Scale AI and Miro who moved past that barrier, and what changed for their close, their teams, and their audits.

The checklist managed the close. It never automated it.

For two decades, close software has coordinated the work: task lists, sign-offs, status. That mattered. Teams that adopted it ran tighter, more organized closes because of it.

But the preparation itself never moved. Journal entries, reconciliations, transaction matching, and flux analysis still get built by hand, often in spreadsheets, then logged in the checklist when they’re done.

That is now changing. Agents can pull source transactions, prepare entries, reconcile accounts as data arrives, and draft detailed variance explanations. They can then route the completed work to an accountant for review, with the supporting evidence attached.

The hours previously spent on tie-outs and manual processes that checklists could only observe can instead go toward reviewing exceptions, investigating issues, and doing the analysis the team never had time for.

This session is a practical conversation with two accounting leaders who have made that shift in high-volume, high-complexity, audit-heavy environments. They’ll share what changed for their close, their teams, and their audits, including faster close cycles, greater accuracy, and significant time and cost savings.

What you will learn

Where checklist tools stop, and why coordinating the close is different from preparing it

Why checklist tools struggle in high-transaction-volume, multi-entity environments, leaving teams with manual workarounds and Excel tie-outs

What agentic close automation looks like in practice, beyond bolt-on AI features layered on top of task coordination

How Scale AI and Miro evaluated AI-native close automation platforms, and which criteria mattered most

What happens to the accountant’s role when preparers become reviewers, and how teams create capacity without adding headcount

What auditors actually ask when agents prepare the work, and how evidence, lineage, and re-performance work in practice

How to pressure-test any automation vendor’s claims, including ours, and the questions these two leaders asked before making the move

Who should attend

Controllers, CAOs, VPs of accounting, and finance systems leaders at companies where the close still runs on spreadsheets plus a checklist.


About the Speakers

Josh Waldron

Josh leads accounting at Scale AI through rapid, pre-IPO-scale growth under a KPMG audit. His team automated 98% of cash workflows across 10+ upstream data sources by moving close preparation off checklist tooling and onto agent-prepared automation. Today, the team closes three days faster.

Madison Farnsworth

Madison owns the architecture behind Miro’s accounting and finance stack, helping design how the ERP, source systems, and automation work together to automate the close. She leads Miro’s adoption of agent-prepared workflows across bonus accruals, cash journals, and T&E coding.

Yogi Goel

Yogi is the CEO and Co-founder of Maxima. Previously, he led finance at Rubrik and spent two decades building and scaling accounting organizations across EY, Citigroup, and Barclays. Today, he works with some of the world’s leading finance teams to adopt agentic AI across the financial close.

Speakers

Chief Accounting Officer & Interim CFO, Scale AI

Josh Waldron

Josh Waldron

Head of Finance Systems, Miro

Madison Farnsworth

Madison Farnsworth

CEO & Co-founder, Maxima

Yogi Goel

Yogi Goel
Webinar registration illustration with the selected webinar title and description.

Reserve your spot

Gradient background

Back to webinars

Upcoming
aug 27
11:00 AM PT

Why accounting teams are moving beyond checklists

Dark Blue Background Illustration

Reserve your spot

Beyond the Checklist

Checklist tools coordinated the close. The preparation stayed manual. Hear from two accounting leaders at Scale AI and Miro who moved past that barrier, and what changed for their close, their teams, and their audits.

The checklist managed the close. It never automated it.

For two decades, close software has coordinated the work: task lists, sign-offs, status. That mattered. Teams that adopted it ran tighter, more organized closes because of it.

But the preparation itself never moved. Journal entries, reconciliations, transaction matching, and flux analysis still get built by hand, often in spreadsheets, then logged in the checklist when they’re done.

That is now changing. Agents can pull source transactions, prepare entries, reconcile accounts as data arrives, and draft detailed variance explanations. They can then route the completed work to an accountant for review, with the supporting evidence attached.

The hours previously spent on tie-outs and manual processes that checklists could only observe can instead go toward reviewing exceptions, investigating issues, and doing the analysis the team never had time for.

This session is a practical conversation with two accounting leaders who have made that shift in high-volume, high-complexity, audit-heavy environments. They’ll share what changed for their close, their teams, and their audits, including faster close cycles, greater accuracy, and significant time and cost savings.

What you will learn

Where checklist tools stop, and why coordinating the close is different from preparing it

Why checklist tools struggle in high-transaction-volume, multi-entity environments, leaving teams with manual workarounds and Excel tie-outs

What agentic close automation looks like in practice, beyond bolt-on AI features layered on top of task coordination

How Scale AI and Miro evaluated AI-native close automation platforms, and which criteria mattered most

What happens to the accountant’s role when preparers become reviewers, and how teams create capacity without adding headcount

What auditors actually ask when agents prepare the work, and how evidence, lineage, and re-performance work in practice

How to pressure-test any automation vendor’s claims, including ours, and the questions these two leaders asked before making the move

Who should attend

Controllers, CAOs, VPs of accounting, and finance systems leaders at companies where the close still runs on spreadsheets plus a checklist.


About the Speakers

Josh Waldron

Josh leads accounting at Scale AI through rapid, pre-IPO-scale growth under a KPMG audit. His team automated 98% of cash workflows across 10+ upstream data sources by moving close preparation off checklist tooling and onto agent-prepared automation. Today, the team closes three days faster.

Madison Farnsworth

Madison owns the architecture behind Miro’s accounting and finance stack, helping design how the ERP, source systems, and automation work together to automate the close. She leads Miro’s adoption of agent-prepared workflows across bonus accruals, cash journals, and T&E coding.

Yogi Goel

Yogi is the CEO and Co-founder of Maxima. Previously, he led finance at Rubrik and spent two decades building and scaling accounting organizations across EY, Citigroup, and Barclays. Today, he works with some of the world’s leading finance teams to adopt agentic AI across the financial close.

Speakers

Chief Accounting Officer & Interim CFO, Scale AI

Josh Waldron

Josh Waldron

Head of Finance Systems, Miro

Madison Farnsworth

Madison Farnsworth

CEO & Co-founder, Maxima

Yogi Goel

Yogi Goel
Webinar registration illustration with the selected webinar title and description.

Reserve your spot