Turn transaction matching into true exception review
Agent-prepared transaction matches, review-ready, with exceptions, and source-to-match traceability.

Request demo
High-volume matching
Continuously match millions of transactions across banks, processors, and subledgers.
Multi-way matching
Reconcile across three or more systems without forcing complex workflows into two-way rules.
Tolerance-based matching
Automatically clear differences within approved thresholds and route material exceptions for review.
Intelligent exception resolution
Max investigates what doesn’t tie, explains why, and recommends what to do next.
Deterministic by design
Same rules, same data, same result.
Traceable to source
Trace every match back to the underlying records.
Controlled changes
Approved logic and locked periods stay permissioned.
Complete audit trails
Every rule change, match, exception, and agent action is logged.
Built for accounting teams operating at scale
98%
match rates across a global multi-entity environment
Brex transaction matching across three entities
$21M
In monthly transaction matched continuously
50%
reduction time in bank-GL matching
What types of transaction matching can Maxima automate?
Maxima supports cash and bank reconciliations, payment processor matching, AP and AR, intercompany, GL-to-subledger, and system-to-system matching. Common workflows include bank-to-GL, Stripe payouts-to-GL, Coupa-to-NetSuite, and other high-volume reconciliations.
Can Maxima match transactions across more than two systems?
Yes. Maxima supports multi-way matching across three or more systems, including workflows spanning the GL, payment processors, banks, subledgers, and internal systems.
Do I need to build matching rules myself?
No. Accounting teams can configure rules directly, or point Max at their datasets to have it propose matching logic tailored to the data and reconciliation process. Your team reviews and approves the logic before it runs.
What happens if Max suggests the wrong matching logic?
Your team reviews and approves Max-created logic before it runs in production. If Max investigates an exception where the right answer isn’t clear, it surfaces its reasoning and supporting evidence for accountant review rather than silently clearing the item.
What happens to transactions that don’t match?
They remain visible as exceptions rather than being forced into a match. Your team can investigate and resolve them directly in the reconciliation, including matching, ignoring, carrying forward, or preparing a correcting journal entry.
Can Maxima handle messy or inconsistent source data?
Yes. Maxima can transform each source independently before matching, including FX conversions, lookups, formulas, mappings, sign changes, and validations. This lets teams match the underlying accounting activity even when systems structure it differently.
Does Maxima use AI to decide whether transactions match?
Approved matching logic executes deterministically: the same rules applied to the same data produce the same result. Max is used to build matching logic and investigate complex exceptions, rather than putting a probabilistic model in the core matching path.
Can Maxima create journal entries from unmatched transactions?
Yes. Accountants can create correcting journal entries directly from reconciliation exceptions and route them through the normal review and approval workflow, rather than rebuilding the adjustment separately.
How is Maxima different from transaction matching in NetSuite?
NetSuite matching is designed primarily for matching within the ERP. Maxima brings detailed transaction data together across banks, processors, subledgers, warehouses, and other systems, handling high-volume and complex matching outside the ERP without forcing that processing into NetSuite.
How is Maxima different from traditional transaction matching software?
Traditional matching tools rely heavily on predefined rules and leave teams to investigate what those rules cannot resolve. Maxima combines deterministic matching with source-level transformations and Max to build complex matching logic and investigate the long tail of exceptions.
Move closer to an audit-ready, continuous close

Request demo






